![]() ![]() ![]() On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the rapidly spreading disease as a pandemic and called on countries to plan preparatory and response actions in line with the Global Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan ( WHO, 2020a Vasavada, 2020). Pandemic, COVID-19, agriculture, food, supply chain IntroductionĪs the COVID-19 disease spread rapidly to six continents by the novel coronavirus SARS-nCoV-2, many countries around the world have declared state of health emergency. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the agriculture and food sector and to summarize the recommendations required to reduce and control the effect of the pandemic. The supply chain also should be flexible enough to respond to the challenges in the food supply chain. In conclusion, each country must realize the severity of the situation and sometimes should tighten or loosen the measures according to the spread of the pandemic. Food protectionist policies should be avoided to prevent an increase in food prices. Facilities should change the working conditions and maintain the health and safety of employees by altering safety measures. In addition, small farmers or vulnerable people should be supported financially. Therefore, governments should facilitate the movement of workers and agri-food products. COVID-19 resulted in the movement restrictions of workers, changes in demand of consumers, closure of food production facilities, restricted food trade policies, and financial pressures in food supply chain. In the light of recent challenges in food supply chain, there is now considerable concern about food production, processing, distribution, and demand. Considering the food supply chain, one of the most important sectors of the economy, it has been seen that COVID-19 has an impact on the whole process from the field to the consumer. The common point of pandemics is their serious negative effects on the global economy. ![]() Making a bus line between the 2 towns should allow you to satisfy "cheap" passengers too while the train line will serve "fast" passengers.A pandemic is not a new event encountered in the history of humanity because mankind has faced various pandemics in history. From 1900s they will go by car instead if the 2 towns are connected by road. So for these people even if you have a train line, "cheap" passengers might not use it. Then for people who want to travel to another town, train is a "fast" option and a bus line is a "cheap" option. Some travel across town (I mean within the same town but not one block farbut a fair distance like 10 blocks far), for such people I believe bus lines are good enough to satisfy "cheap" passengers, for "fast" passengers maybe trams are good enough, I'm not sure. But this is a pointless exercise since destroying buildings is very expensive and they will be quickly rebuilt anyway. The only way to force them to use your services is to destroy all commercial and industrial building in the town and hop that they find a job/shop in another town. Some people travel to work/shops which are one block away from their home, so there's no feasible way to create a profitable line for them. The percentage of people using your lines depends on availability of "fast" and "cheap" options to travel to their destination. Originally posted by Plague:Additionally, I've noticed that in the needs of a town, there's the population being served by lines - But I'm not sure how to increase that? - I've fully serviced a town so that all areas are covered by tram / bus, with a train station link to another city + inbound goods, but this always seems very low - around 15-20% - not sure what I'm doing wrong?Thanks!, ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |